This is a controversial issue that has no easy
answers. In order to be fair we should look at all
opinions and find our own, but at the same time try
to be positive and objective, taking historical factors
into consideration.
Jihad is an Arabic Islamic term that means to strive
or struggle in the way of God, and is sometimes
referred to as “the sixth pillar of Islam,” although
it has no official status. Jihad has a wider meaning
in Islamic literature. It can be striving to lead a
good Muslim life, praying and fasting regularly, or
working hard to spread the message of Islam. Jihad
is also used in the meaning of struggle for or defense
of Islam, the “Holy War.”
In Muhammad’s time, polytheists of Arabia were
asked for submission to Islam as a condition for
exoneration. Others, like Christians and Jews, were
forced to pay tribute and submit to the political
authority of the Muslims, for exemption from death
punishment, and for military protection by the
Even though Islamic scholars today have different
opinions on Jihad, there is a consensus that armed
struggle against persecution and oppression will
always continue to be considered legitimate.
Classifications of Jihad by Muslims
Jihad has been classified either as al-jihad al-akbar
(the greater jihad), the struggle against one’s soul
(nafs), or al-jihad al-asghar (the lesser jihad), the
external, physical effort, often implying fighting.
Muslim scholars explained that there are five kinds
1.Jihad of the heart/soul is an inner struggle of
good against evil in the mind.
2.Jihad by the tongue is a struggle of good
against evil waged by writing and speech,
such as in the form of proselytizing, and
sermons that encourage Muslims…etc.
3.Jihad by the pen and knowledge is a struggle
for good against evil through scholarly study
of Islam, and through studying sciences that
are beneficial to mankind.
4.Jihad by the hand refers to a struggle for good
against evil waged by actions or with one’s
wealth, such as going on pilgrimage, taking
care of elderly parents, providing funding for
jihad, political activity for furthering the cause
of Islam, and stopping evil-doings by force.
Jihad by the sword refers to armed fighting
in the way of God, or holy war, the most
common usage by Muslim political activists.
Greater and Lesser Jihad
Muhammad is reported to have told warriors
returning home that they had returned from the
lesser jihad of struggle against unbelievers to a
greater jihad of struggle against evil, lust…etc.
Although the authenticity of that hadith (saying
of Muhammad) is questionable, the underlying
principle of superiority of internal jihad does have a
reliable basis in the Qur’an and other writings.
Jihad as Warfare
The Qur’an asserts that if the use of force would not
have been allowed in curbing the evils by nations,
the disruption and disorder caused by insurgent
nations could have reached the extent that the
places of worship would have become deserted
and forsaken. As it states: “And had it not been
that Allah checks one set of people with another,
the monasteries and churches, the synagogues and
the mosques, in which His praise is abundantly
celebrated would have been utterly destroyed.” –
Qur’an, 22:40
Jihad as warfare could be divided into two types:
1.Against injustice and oppression
2.Against the rejecters of truth after it has
become evident to them
The first type of Jihad is generally considered
eternal, i.e. until doomsday, but the second is
specific to people who were selected by God for
delivering the truth as an obligation. They are called
witnesses of the truth; the implication being that
they bear witness to the truth before other people in
such a complete and ultimate manner that no one is
left with an excuse to deny the truth.
Thus We [Allah] have appointed you a middle
nation, that ye may be witnesses against mankind,
and that the messenger may be a witness against
you. And We appointed the qiblah which ye formerly
observed only that We might know him who
followeth the messenger, from him who turneth on
his heels. In truth it was a hard (test) save for those
whom Allah guided. But it was not Allah’s purpose
that your faith should be in vain, for Allah is full of
pity, Merciful toward mankind.- Qur’an, 2:143
Similarly, proponents of Companions of Muhammad
as being “the witness” present following verse to
argue that Companions of Muhammad were chosen
people as witnesses just as God chooses prophets
and messengers from mankind. As in Qur’an: “He
has chosen you, and has imposed no difficulties
on you in religion; it is the religion of your father
Abraham. It is He Who has named you Muslims,
both before and in this [He chose you so that] the
Messenger [Muhammad] may be a witness [of
this religion] to you, and you be witnesses of this
religion to non-Muslims [of your times].”—Qur’an,
Following is the first verse of the Qur’an in which
the Companions of Muhammad, who had migrated
from Mecca were given permission to fight back if
they were attacked, after their property in Mecca had
been confiscated by polytheists:
“Permission to take up arms is hereby given to
those who are attacked because they have been
oppressed – Allah indeed has power to grant them
victory – those who have been unjustly driven from
their homes, only because they said: “Our Lord is
Allah:.—Qur’an, 22:39-40
The reason for this directive in Medina, instead of
Mecca, considered by most Muslim scholars is that
without political authority armed offensives become
tantamount to spreading disorder and anarchy in
the society. As one Islamic jurist writes: “Among
Kifayah (see Fard Kifaya below) obligations,
the third category is that for which the existence
of a ruler is necessary e.g., Jihad and execution
of punishments. Therefore, only a ruler has this
prerogative. Because, indeed, no one else has the
right to punish another person.”—Sayyid Sabiq,
fiqhu’l-Sunnah, 2nd
ed., vol.3, (Beirut: Daru’l-Fikr,
1980), p.30
Directive of Warfare
The directive of the Jihad given to Muslims in
Fight in the cause of God those who fight you,
but do not transgress limits; for God loves
not transgressors. And kill them wherever ye
catch them, and turn them out from where
they have turned you out; for persecution
and oppression are worse than slaughter; but
fight them not at the Sacred Mosque, unless
they (first) fight you there; but if they fight
you, kill them. Such is the reward of those
who reject faith. But if they cease, God is Oft-
Forgiving, Most Merciful. And fight them on
until there is no more tumult or oppression,
and there prevail justice and faith in God;
but if they cease, let there be no hostility
except to those who practice oppression.
The prohibited month, for the prohibited
month, and so for all things prohibited,
there is the law of equality. If then any one
transgresses the prohibition against you,
transgress ye likewise against him. But fear
(the punishment of) God, and know that God
is with those who restrain themselves. Qur’an,
Those verses told Muslims that they should not
merely fight Quraish (the ruling tribe in Mecca
during Muhammad’s time) if they resist them in
offering Hajj, but the Qur’an goes on to say that
they should continue to fight Quraish until the
persecution perpetrated by them is uprooted and
Islam prevails in the whole of Arabia. Initially
Muslims were required to fulfill this responsibility
even if the enemy was ten times their might.
Afterwards, the Qur’an reduced the burden of this
responsibility. As in Qur’an: “Prophet! Rouse the
believers to wage war. If there are twenty amongst
you, patient and persevering, they will subdue two
hundred: if a hundred, they will subdue a thousand
of the disbelievers: for these are a people without
understanding.”—Qur’an, 8:65
“[From] now, God as lightened your [task] or He
knows that there is now weakness amongst you: But
[ever so], if there are a hundred of you, patient and
persevering, they will subdue two hundred, and if a
thousand, they will subdue two thousand, with the
leave of God: for God is with those who patiently
persevere.”—Qur’an, 8.66
Some interpret the above verses that Jihad never
becomes obligatory unless the military might of
the Muslims is up to a certain level. In the times
of Muhammad, when large scale conversions took
place in the later phase, the Qur’an reduced the
Muslim to enemy ratio to 1:2. It then seemed that
Muslims should not only consolidate their moral
character, but it was also imperative for them to
build their military might if they wanted to wage
Jihad when the need arose. The Qur’an gave a
similar directive to Muslims of Muhammad times in
the following words:
“Muster against them all the men and cavalry at
your disposal so that you can strike terror into the
enemies of Allah and of the believers and others
beside them who may be unknown to you, though
Allah knows them. And remember whatever you
spend for the cause of Allah shall be repaid to you.
You shall not be wronged.”—Qur’an, 8:60
Some scholars consider the later command of
ratio 1:2 only for a particular time. A policy was
adopted regarding the extent of requirement that
arose in wars that the Muslims had to fight. In
the battles of Badr, Uhud and Tabuk (during the
life of Muhammad, in the 7th
responsibility was much more and each Muslim was
required to present his services as a combatant. As
century A.D), the
“Not equal are those of the believers who sit [at
home] without any [genuine] excuse and those who
strive hard and fight in the cause of Allah with their
wealth and their lives. Allah has given preference
by a degree to those who strive hard and gift with
their wealth and their lives above those who sit [at
home]. [In reality], for each, Allah has made a good
promise and [in reality] Allah has preferred those
who strive hard and fight above those who sit [at
home] by a huge reward. Degrees of [higher] grades
from Him and forgiveness and mercy. And Allah is
Ever Forgiving, Most Merciful.”—Qur’an, 4:95-96
Ethical Limits
Observance of treaties and pacts is stressed in the
Qur’an. When some Muslims were still in Mecca,
and they couldn’t migrate to Medina, the Qur’an
“And to those who accepted faith but did not migrate
[to Madinah], you owe no duty of protection to
them until they migrate; but if they seek your help in
religion, it is your duty to help them except against
a people with whom you have a treaty of mutual
alliance; and Allah is the All-Seer of what you
do.”—Qur’an, 8:72
Reports attributed to Muhammad speak harshly
about those who break treaties, and warn them of
God’s punishment. Other directives may include:
1.A display of pomp and pride should be
avoided when an army sets out for a battle.
As in Qur’an: “And be not like those who
came out of their homes boastfully and to
display their grandeur and who stop [people]
from the way of Allah even though Allah fully
encompasses what they do.”—Qur’an, 8:47
2.People who want to remain neutral in war
should be left alone and not be troubled in any
way. As in Qur’an: “Or those who approach
you such that they neither have the courage
to fight you nor their own people [and are
such that] had Allah willed, indeed He would
have given them power over you, and they
would have fought you. So if they withdraw
from you, and fight not against you, and
offer you peace, then Allah does not give you
permission to take any action against them.”—
Qur’an, 4:90
3.People who neither take part in a battle nor are
able to take part in it – as per the dictates of
custom as well as sense and reason – should
not be killed. As according to a hadith:
‘Abdullah Ibn’ Umar reports from the Prophet
that once in a battle when a woman had been
killed, the Prophet emphatically forbade the
killing of the women and children, Sahih
Bukhari 3015
4.People among the enemy should not be killed
by setting them ablaze.
5.Plundering and looting should be abstained
from. As according to a hadith: A person
from the Ansar (resident of Medinah who
supported Muhammad when he migrated)
narrates that once while traveling for a Jihad,
because of great compulsion, some people
of the Muslim army snatched some goats to
satisfy their hunger. When the Prophet came
to know about this, he overturned all the
utensils and remarked: ‘plundered (food) is
not better than dead meat’ (meaning forbidden
because eating animals that decayed or were
not killed in the Islamic way is forbidden).
Sahih Bukhari 2705
6.Dead bodies should not be mutilated.
7.Setting up obstructions and robbing travelers
is forbidden.
8.Wrong no one and exercise no torture.
9.Do not touch the children, women and the old.
10. Do not destroy fruit-trees and fertile lands.
11. Do not kill sheep or cattle.
12. Respect all religious persons who live in
hermitages and convents and spare their
edifices.
Objectives of warfare
According to verses 2:190-194, the Qur’an implies
two objectives:
1.Uproot fitnah (sedition) or persecution
(forcing people to renounce their Islamic
religion).
2.Establish supremacy of Islam in the Arabian
Peninsula (and the rest of the world).
Against persecution
Directives for action against persecution can be
found in verse 8:39. At another place, the Qur’an
“And what has come over you that you fight not in
the cause of Allah, and for those weak, ill-treated
and oppressed among men, women, and children,
whose cry is: ‘Our Lord! Rescue us from this town
whose people are oppressors, and raise for us from
You one who will protect, and raise for us from You
one who will help. [You should know that] those
who believe fight in the cause of Allah, and those
who disbelieve, fight in the cause of Satan. So fight
you against the friends of Satan. Ever feeble indeed
is the plot of Satan.”—Qur’an, 4:75-76
Most Muslim scholars consider it an eternal
directive and believe that all types of oppression
should be considered under this directive. Similarly,
if a group of Muslims commit unwarranted
aggression against some of their brothers and
does not desist from it even after all attempts of
reconciliation, such a group according to the Qur’an
should be fought with:
“And if two parties or groups among the believers
start fighting, then make peace between them
both. But if one of them outrages against the other,
then fight you against the one which outrages till
it compiles with the command of Allah. Then if
it compiles, make reconciliation between them
justly, and be equitable. Verily! Allah loves those
who are the equitable. The believers are brothers
to one another. So make reconciliation between
your brothers, and fear Allah that you may receive
mercy.”—Qur’an, 49:9-10
If Muslims do not have a state, then in such a
situation, Muhammad while answering a question
raised by one of his followers, directed Muslims
to dissociate themselves from such anarchy and
I asked: if there is no state or ruler of the
Muslims? He replied: In this situation,
dissociate yourself from all groups, even if you
have to chew the roots of a tree at the time of
your death. Sahah Bukhari 7084
Even though the discourse mentioned above
undermines the legitimacy of today’s Jihadists who
wage war on the West without the support of the
Muslim authorities, and seem like loose canons,
there is more to say on this issue.
There are two kinds of religious duties in Islam;
Fard Ayn, where every Muslim should do,
Fard Kifaya, where only a group of Muslims is
responsible to fulfill. Hence, wagging Jihad to
free other nations from “darkness” and expand
the borders of the Muslim community is Fard
Kifaya. But waging war in order to defend Muslim
community is Fard Ayn, where every Muslim
would be a sinner, if he does not fulfill. Thus, when
Muslim lands are occupied, it is the duty of every
Muslim to wage Jihad.
What is the truth in this and which path a Muslim
should follow?
As some Muslim scholars say, ask your heart, even
if people give you verdicts. And as most Muslim
scholars say: Allah Knows better.
Somehow I don’t sense the story line as in biblical scripture, such as why this or that was said to who in what year and national time period. It seems the old testament has a better sense of nation building or setting apart His chosen tribes.
Also even when Abraham sat out on his journey – doesn’t scripture imply that it was not just Abraham and his wife who left their homeland but a large contingent of people who were the workers of the household or in modern language – slaves or we might say and person working and affiliated with the complete income possibilities of the family unit.
I know even up until Luther’s time the religion of the local populace was to be the same as the king or ruler in that moment of time. My mind doesn’t accept the idea of believe what I tell you to believe or die as in Islam. If a person is required to pay for the right to live in your homeland under the law of another religion you don’t like – a person would always be a lesser citizen because they would have to produce more than the average Muslim to pay the non-believer tax..
Granted we pay a nonbeliever tax of sorts in America to our government if you worship a god or not, just for civil services and protection. But in America you can lay down in the middle of a street and say I don’t want to live anymore, just let me die ……. but somebody will come along and demand that you must live if you like it or not ……
I admire the thought that we live by our personal faith in God, as in each day how many rocks are set in our paths to stumble over and help us to change our attitudes hour after hour into better or worse? Is it not our personal perception of who God is that gives us that needed – PEACE BEYOND OUR UNDERSTANDING – to make it through the day?
Missed Point 5….the article mentioned five points and identified four points.
Good summary of jihad as taught by the Quran and by Islamists today.